Strange

Enact a mask ordinance during the slow month of May, then discard the mask ordinance (or rather, yield to Larimer County, which essentially requires no masks, just "encourages" them, which means they won't be worn) for the much busier month of June.  Do I have that right?  Not a great start, and not a great way to mobilize the four votes you always have in your back pocket.

And Ken Zornes voted in favor of this, took a 180?  Ouch.  And Cindy Younglund is way out of her element when it comes to liquor ordinances.  No, that wasn't a question.  Cindy, just a hint - You just got on the board, and you have never been a fixture in the audience at town board meetings.  Not sure you have ever attended one, unless it was because you stumbled into town hall looking for your knitting class.  Let other, more experienced board members, make the motions on quasi-judicial matters.  Unless you are a genius, or know a lot about liquor ordinances.

But I wasn't sensing that.  When you said "the needs are being met..."  In order for this charade about granting liquor licenses to go forward, you have to pretend the liquor available just up the street at Safeway, or just across the street at Ed's Cantina, isn't meeting the needs of the rum-hungry public.